Singapore Birth Rate vs Available Primary One Places

Share

Updated 1 July 2016.  Parents are often concerned about the competition for places or vacancies available for Primary One Registration in the year for which their loved ones are due.  Traditionally, the birth rate peaks during the Year of the Dragon.

For the convenience of parents, we have mapped Singapore’s birth rate data for the years 2000-2011, against the available vacancies for Primary One Registration in the years 2006-2017.

Note that the Birth Sign refers to birth sign of children who are due for Primary One Registration for that year, ie. they will be attending Primary One in the following year.

While it is generally true that lower birth rates lead to lower available places in Primary 1, there are anomalies where the available places actually increased slightly even though the birth rate fell, ie. between 2007 to 2008.  Obviously, our Ministry of Education has access other data such as the number of foreign-born children that are likely to be vying for places during those years and has made provisions as such.

Note that this is based on data that is publicly available from the Department of Statistics and Ministry of Education.

It is the year they

It is the year they start school, not the year of birth

2010  is year of TIGER

2010  is year of TIGER leh

but graph show is monkey?

Check out the Parents' Networking Groups

If you are looking for comments on the schools, just head over to the Parents’ Networking Groups for these schools.

P1 Registration for Next Year Intake 2015

HI,

If anyone, can give some comments on these neighbourhood schools?  Are they good?  E.g. Jing Shan, Mayflower, Townville?

Need some guidance before the enrolment.  tks.

 

 

@quixation

The year above the zodiac is not the birth year, but the year that zodiac is going to register for P1.

So your 2007 piglet (I have one myself) will be registering for P1 in 2013.

erm, i think the Zodiac

erm, i think the Zodiac stated is wrong.. my girl is 2007 she is born under the sign of the pig.. not snake.. is the above correct?

However, kudos to Chief to really work all this out for us busy parents!!! thanks alot!

Thanks for sharing :)

Thanks for sharing 🙂

Was wondering if there is a

Was wondering if there is a birth rate chart which shows the no. of boys & girls for the year 2003-2005?

Private institutions

Do we have any statistics on the no. of pupils studying in Private International schools.

Insufficient primary school places

With the huge influx of foreigners to Singapore I am just wondering if MOE has got it planning right

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/content/singapore-birth-rate-vs-available-primary-one-places.

Looking at this year registration, there still to be very strong demand even for the lowest birth rate in Singapore history.

Hope that MOE has better planning than the poor HDB ‘s forecasting of new flats and carparking.

Hope I am wrong about this

Primary School Open House

hi Novena
 
I do not know why only some primary schools have open house. Perhaps these are newer schools and would like people to know more about them. Those schools that have been around for some time probably felt less the need to do so.
 
Typically, individual primary schools would advertise such events on their school website, some sent brochures to childcares in the neighbourhood. 
 
We have a thread in the forum here which parents share such informations. Do check it out and share your information too.
 
 http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11382
 
 

Happy 45th Birthday ! Singapore !!

boys versus girl

Yes, totally agree with your point. But where can we find such statistics.

primary school open house

Y not much primary school having open house to newly parent for P1 student 2011??? any website to check abt tis?

Primary one registration for year 2011

There is still competition for popular primary one places, however the situation will not be that bad as compared to dragon year. I noticed the birthrate trend up for those born after year 2004, which mean more balloting.

My guess is those leaving < 1km will get to the school of their choce without ballot.

Hope every parent get their children to their choice school……

 

 

 

Nice information

However we shouldnt forget the number of PR’s are increasing and this birth rate is only for Singaporeans.. whereaas PR;s are also eligible..

Babies take 9 months to

Babies take 9 months to come excluding time taken to conceive one.
 
Since baby bonus was introduced in 2004, its effect, if any, can only be seen in late 2005 and after.
 
I agree with busymom that SAR may have a part to play in the lower birth rates. Some parent may be worried of frequent visit to clinics if conceive then.
 

Proud Daddy of P1 Boy at Tao Nan School …

The drop in 2004 birthrate was probably a result of SARS in 2003

The drop in 2004 birth rate was probably a result of SARS in 2003.  While baby bonus was announced in 2004, it was announced in August.  It applies only to babies who are born after August.  Unfortunately, I didn’t have the foresight to plan for my daughter to be born in the later part of that year

However, the increase in birth rate in the subsequent years does indicate that the baby bonus has had some effect, albeit slightly.

Baby Bonus

Govt efforts to increase babies do not seem to have boosted take-up rate. The baby bonus was announced in 2004 but there seemed to be a surge in kids born in 2003.  My daughter is a ’04 child and will have to register for P1 this year.

It will be interesting to watch this year’s balloting, because the Govt just announced the news that children who are Singapore Citizens will get a double chance should there be balloting.

Boys versus girls

It will be interesting to know what is the proportion of boys and girls, based on available statistics, for each of those years, to make a better and more informed analysis.

5 Polytrchnics in Singapore

Now have 5 Polytechnics in Singapore, I guessed should be more easier to get in. I remembered in the old days where there are just 2 polytechnics.So if every suject get C6 then 36 points means no places to go.

it seems that our

it seems that our government effort (ads,bonus, rebate) didn’t boost up the birth rate much.

High Birthrate, more vacanies but also more balloting

High birthrate will only end up in more balloting, regardless of the vacancies. 

The ever popular ones will have balloting for kids (mainly within 1km, instead balloting for those  within the 1km – 2 km during low birth rates years ), resulting in those staying in more than 1km to go to their second tier schools.  As such, the second tier schools will have to go through balloting.

For eg, my girl’s school does not go thorugh balloting.  But kids staying more than 2km have to go through balloting for the "Dragon" year cohort.

SO for parents who have kids born during high birthrate years, do have back up plans.

 

 

 

Places For Everybody

So if everyone go to their nearby primary school that mean that is places of everyone. No ballloting would be surfacing out in Phase 2C.

 

Interesting phenomenon

Hey Chief,

Interesting findings.  Now, any wonder why our Principals and headmasters are heading out of country to look for students? The classrooms are getting emptier.  So, imagine the poorer polytechnics empty in 2011.  That situation is very real, all the students go to the better polys leaving the weaker ones empty.  Solution is to look to China/India etc.

With the lower birthrates, would it also mean lower t-score to get into better schools, looks like it.  However, this is buffered by the foreign students also taking the PSLE (this years top student is from China!!), meaning we are slowly giving up our top places to foreigners.

Hm… the education landscape and our classrooms will certainly change very quickly.  Is Singapore going to become an education hub?  Looks like we are heading there.  But hey, we’ve got to make our system great ….

Don't forget that we are

Don’t forget that we are also catering to foreign students. It would be better if the no of  this group of students are also taken into consideration.

The principle must be that

The principle must be that the supply is always greater than the overall demand, else the policy of making complusory education for all eligible kids useless.

I guess it is more of the 2nd order issue, where parents want to get their child into a "better" or more conveniently located school.

My take is this type of "demand" will always be there as most parents simply want the best available means for their off-springs.

My bet is while overall supply always cater a buffer, the choice schools supply did not acutally increase but was actually due to more new schools or increases in the supply of neighbourhood schools where the town profile comprises new/growing families.

Related Articles