Each year, some students in Singapore consider overseas universities for their undergraduate studies. But with so many choices available, how do you decide which universities are worth applying to?
There is no official list of approved overseas universities in Singapore, and no central authority that recognises foreign degrees, so students are responsible for checking that an institution is legitimate.
There are three main global university ranking systems, QS, Times, and Shanghai, each using a different approach to evaluate universities.
The table below compares the top 50 universities in the QS World University Rankings 2027 with their positions in the Times and Shanghai rankings, along with each one's mix of domestic and international students.
Below, we address these common questions:
We hope this provides a good starting point for exploring your options!
Is there an official list of overseas universities that are "approved" in Singapore?
No. Singapore's Ministry of Education has stated that it does not have a list of accredited overseas universities. There is also no central authority in Singapore that assesses or grants recognition for degrees obtained from overseas universities.
Employers in Singapore have the liberty to decide if a potential employee has the qualification most relevant to their needs.
Avoiding degree mills
Since there is no official list of approved overseas universities in Singapore, students are responsible for checking whether the institution they choose is legitimate. This means avoiding degree mills, which are fraudulent organisations that offer degrees with little or no academic study. These degrees may be awarded quickly and are typically not recognised by official education authorities, making them effectively useless for employment or further study. Some degree mills even adopt names that resemble those of reputable institutions to appear credible.
To avoid such pitfalls, students should check whether the university is accredited by the relevant education authority in its home country and whether its programmes are widely accepted. Embassies or high commissions can help verify this information.
Professional degrees, such as those in engineering, medicine, law, and accountancy, should be recognised by the relevant professional bodies in Singapore. For example, an individual with an overseas engineering degree should first check whether the qualification is recognised by the Professional Engineers Board, before registering as an engineer in Singapore.
If an overseas university offers its courses in Singapore through a local partner or agent, the university and its agent are fully responsible for the quality and delivery of the programme. Students considering such courses should do thorough research before enrolling.
How are universities ranked in the world?
There are three main global university ranking systems, each using a different approach to evaluate universities. These are the QS, Times, and Shanghai rankings, which we'll outline below:
The QS World University Rankings is published by Quacquarelli Symonds, a UK-based company that specialises in higher education analysis.
The 2027 QS ranking is based on five main areas:
Research and Discovery (50%): The largest area, covering Academic Reputation (30%), based on a global survey of academics asked to name the best universities in their field, and Citations per Faculty (20%), which measures how often an institution's research is cited, divided by the number of faculty to account for different institution sizes.
Employability and Outcomes (20%): Covers Employer Reputation (15%), drawn from a global survey of employers, and Employment Outcomes (5%), which looks at graduate employability and the later success of alumni.
Global Engagement (15%): Based on the International Faculty Ratio, International Research Network, and International Student Ratio, each weighted at 5%. International Student Diversity is also tracked but not given a score.
Learning Experience (10%): Measured by the Faculty-Student Ratio, the number of academic staff relative to students.
Sustainability (5%): Assesses a university's commitment to environmental, social, and governance responsibilities.
QS may update its ranking methodology from time to time, so check the QS website for the latest information.
A common criticism of the QS system is that nearly half of the score is based on survey responses; Academic Reputation and Employer Reputation together make up 45%. This tends to favour long-established universities.
One final note: if you see an equal sign next to a rank (e.g. =25), it means that two or more universities share that position.
The Times World University Rankings is produced by Times Higher Education, a UK-based organisation known for evaluating research-intensive universities. The 2026 rankings use 18 indicators across five main areas:
Teaching (29.5%): Includes teaching reputation, student-staff ratio, postgraduate training, and institutional income.
Research Environment (29%): Looks at how much research a university produces, how well it is funded, and how it is regarded by academic peers.
Research Quality (30%): Measures the influence and excellence of research through citation counts, research strength, and global impact.
International Outlook (7.5%): Assesses the university's global engagement, based on international students, staff, and collaborative research.
Industry (4%): Evaluates how well a university works with industry, based on research income from commercial partnerships and how often its research is cited in patents.
Compared to QS, which gives 45% weight to reputation surveys, Times places more emphasis on measurable research outcomes and funding. This can result in significant differences between the two rankings, especially for newer universities that are research-strong but less globally famous.
The QS and Times rankings are UK-based and widely used, and students may benefit from consulting both for a fuller picture.
The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), often called the Shanghai Ranking, is published by ShanghaiRanking Consultancy, an independent organisation based in China.
This ranking focuses mainly on research strength and academic achievement. It uses six indicators, grouped into four areas:
Quality of Education (10%): Looks at how many of a university's alumni have won Nobel Prizes or Fields Medals.
Quality of Faculty (40%): Considers both the number of Nobel or Fields Medal winners among staff (20%) and the number of researchers listed as Highly Cited Researchers (20%).
Research Output (40%): Measures how much high-level research a university produces, including papers published in Nature and Science (20%), and papers indexed in major research databases like the Science Citation Index (20%).
Per Capita Performance (10%): Adjusts the total score based on the size of the university's academic staff, so smaller universities aren't penalised.
For universities that focus mostly on humanities and social sciences, such as the London School of Economics, the Nature and Science metric is skipped, and the points are redistributed to the other categories.
The Shanghai Ranking could be viewed as more objective, because it doesn't include subjective measures like reputation surveys. Scoring is based primarily on research and awards, but this also means it tends to favour large, science-focused universities.
For students choosing a degree course, this ranking is most useful if you're looking at research-focused institutions.
How do top universities compare across the rankings?
The table below shows the top 50 universities in the QS World University Rankings 2027, alongside where each one sits in the Times 2026 and Shanghai 2025 rankings. It also includes each university's student mix (the split between domestic and international students), based on QS data.
A few things to keep in mind as you read it.
The three rankings are from different years, as each publisher releases on its own schedule.
An equal sign (=) means universities share that position.
The Shanghai ranking only gives exact positions for its top 100; below that, it groups universities into bands, such as 101-150.
For mobile users, swipe to see all columns →
| School | Country | QS 2027 | Times 2026 | Shanghai 2025 | Domestic Students | International Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | US | 1 | 2 | 3 | 67% | 33% |
| Imperial College London | UK | =2 | 8 | 26 | 47% | 53% |
| Stanford University | US | =2 | =5 | 2 | 80% | 20% |
| University of Oxford | UK | 4 | 1 | 6 | 59% | 41% |
| Harvard University | US | 5 | =5 | 1 | 75% | 25% |
| University of Cambridge | UK | 6 | =3 | 4 | 62% | 38% |
| California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | US | 7 | 7 | 9 | 67% | 33% |
| ETH Zurich | Switzerland | =8 | 11 | 22 | 56% | 44% |
| UCL | UK | =8 | 22 | 14 | 38% | 62% |
| National University of Singapore (NUS) | Singapore | 10 | 17 | 56 | 59% | 41% |
| The University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong SAR | 11 | 33 | 67 | 44% | 56% |
| Nanyang Technological University (NTU Singapore) | Singapore | 12 | =31 | 88 | 61% | 39% |
| Peking University | China | 13 | 13 | 23 | 84% | 16% |
| Tsinghua University | China | 14 | 12 | 18 | 84% | 16% |
| University of Pennsylvania | US | 15 | 14 | 14 | 75% | 25% |
| Cornell University | US | =16 | =18 | 12 | 74% | 26% |
| Yale University | US | =16 | 10 | 11 | 75% | 25% |
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) | Hong Kong SAR | 18 | =41 | 101-150 | 59% | 41% |
| The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) | Australia | 19 | 79 | 80 | 48% | 52% |
| Johns Hopkins University | US | =20 | 16 | 19 | 55% | 45% |
| University of California, Berkeley (UCB) | US | =20 | 9 | 5 | 78% | 22% |
| EPFL | Switzerland | =22 | 35 | 44 | 37% | 63% |
| The University of Melbourne | Australia | =22 | 37 | 38 | 47% | 53% |
| University of Chicago | US | 24 | 15 | 10 | 65% | 35% |
| Technical University of Munich | Germany | 25 | 27 | 45 | 63% | 37% |
| Fudan University | China | 26 | 36 | 41 | 83% | 17% |
| Princeton University | US | 27 | =3 | 7 | 76% | 24% |
| The University of Sydney | Australia | 28 | =53 | 72 | 38% | 62% |
| Australian National University (ANU) | Australia | 29 | =73 | 101-150 | 57% | 43% |
| McGill University | Canada | 30 | =41 | 76 | 67% | 33% |
| Monash University | Australia | 31 | =58 | 76 | 42% | 58% |
| University of Toronto | Canada | 32 | 21 | 25 | 61% | 39% |
| The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology | Hong Kong SAR | 33 | =58 | 201-300 | 49% | 51% |
| Université PSL | France | 34 | 48 | 34 | 75% | 25% |
| The University of Edinburgh | UK | 35 | 29 | 37 | 52% | 48% |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | China | 36 | 40 | 30 | 90% | 10% |
| King's College London | UK | 37 | 38 | 61 | 57% | 43% |
| Seoul National University | South Korea | 38 | =58 | 81 | 88% | 12% |
| The University of Tokyo | Japan | 39 | 26 | 31 | 83% | 17% |
| The University of Manchester | UK | =40 | 56 | 46 | 55% | 45% |
| The University of Queensland | Australia | =40 | =80 | 65 | 44% | 56% |
| Yonsei University | South Korea | 42 | 86 | 151-200 | 73% | 27% |
| Columbia University | US | =43 | 20 | 8 | 60% | 40% |
| Institut Polytechnique de Paris | France | =43 | =68 | 201-300 | 57% | 43% |
| Northwestern University | US | =45 | 30 | 31 | 76% | 24% |
| University of British Columbia | Canada | =45 | 45 | 53 | 75% | 25% |
| Zhejiang University | China | 47 | 39 | 24 | 89% | 11% |
| Delft University of Technology | Netherlands | 48 | 57 | 151-200 | 64% | 36% |
| University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) | US | 49 | =18 | 16 | 87% | 13% |
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Hong Kong SAR | 50 | 80 | 151-200 | 51% | 49% |
Want to chat with other parents about tertiary education? Join the conversation on the KiasuParents forum!