THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

General comments and chit-chat, or tell us how we can improve KiasuParents.com
Post Reply
pirate
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Jul 02,
Total Likes:173

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by pirate » Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:10 am

I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:

We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:

SAHM_TAN
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 11066
Joined: Fri Mar 26,
Total Likes:30

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by SAHM_TAN » Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:37 am

chenwj wrote:Actually many things in life are "discriminatory". It's how u live with it :smile:

In their countries, LGBT are able to get married and gain state recognition. But I understand there's are differences between Civil Union and full Marriage in their context and they are pushing for their respective states to recognize a "Full marriage".

I think the issue here is about reaching a compromise and testing the limits on how far the society is able to accept diverse views from a seemingly "minority" group.

The gay sex law in this context of this discussion is 377A, which prohibits the sex between 2 consenting males. Yes it is discriminatory because sex between 2 consenting males is illegal but sex between 2 consenting females is not. :evil: :evil: So by that argument, gays here are perceived to be criminals due to 377A. I am not supporting the gays because if they argue they are perceived to be criminals due to 377A, then almost the whole of Singapore are criminals because I'm sure majority of Singaporeans regardless of sexual orientations bought pirated DVDs or downloaded movies from the net one way or another. Also, I guess some of us here watch porn with your wife or your husband? Technically we are all criminals. So the issue here is whether do the Police enforce these anti-piracy laws / copyright laws / anti-porn laws / anti-gay sex law. :?

SAHM_TAN wrote:From my understanding after reading the article, the words mother and father are replaced with parents in forms and such. I don't think kids with
heterosexual parents cannot call them mummy and daddy or other variations.

I mean for same sex couples, it would not be possible to designate who's the father and who's the mother. I guess there can be 2 forms printed, 1 for heterosexual parents and same sex couples but then it might perceive as a form of discrimination.

The norm of a society is determined by the communities within the particular society. If some have accepted that same sex couples is the norm then just live and let live. I think it's good that they are able to accommodate.

It must be a relieve to live without discrimination, at least in the legal sense.


I thought was discussing abt the article.

SAHM_TAN
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 11066
Joined: Fri Mar 26,
Total Likes:30

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by SAHM_TAN » Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:41 am

pirate wrote:I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:

We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:


I'm not sure if here have but other ctries yes.

Nebbermind
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 16183
Joined: Tue Dec 22,
Total Likes:158

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by Nebbermind » Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:59 am

pirate wrote:I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:

We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:


You meant Pirate1, Pirate2, Pirate3 & Pirate4, right? :laugh:

limlim
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 6939
Joined: Mon Aug 02,
Total Likes:108

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by limlim » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:41 am

thisis2012 wrote:If the PAP allows polygamy, one husband multiple wives, will your vote still go to them?


Yes.. of course.

That's the way mother nature designed it to be.

Anyway.. polygamy is allowed for some pple.. LEGALLY.

in case you're not aware.

Surely AWARE is aware of it but they can't do anything.. :laugh:


Nebbermind
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 16183
Joined: Tue Dec 22,
Total Likes:158

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by Nebbermind » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:43 am

Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:

limlim
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 6939
Joined: Mon Aug 02,
Total Likes:108

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by limlim » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:45 am

pirate wrote:I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:

We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:


Or you can call them East. South, West, North parents...... :laugh:

depending on which is their favorite position on the dry pool..

limlim
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 6939
Joined: Mon Aug 02,
Total Likes:108

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by limlim » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:47 am

Nebbermind wrote:Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:


Not very efficient to propagate the species..

Funz
Councillor
Councillor
Posts: 12515
Joined: Wed May 27,
Total Likes:333

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by Funz » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:50 am

limlim wrote:
Nebbermind wrote:Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:


Not very efficient to propagate the species..


Still efficient what. If husband 1 shoots blanks, still got husband 2, 3 & 4.

SAHM_TAN
KiasuGrandMaster
KiasuGrandMaster
Posts: 11066
Joined: Fri Mar 26,
Total Likes:30

Re: THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by SAHM_TAN » Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:54 am

Nebbermind wrote:Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:


Men lack the ability to maintain such a household in harmony

Post Reply