## Reverse sliding-scale Share Bonus Award

KiasuParents.com holds regular auctions to give away valuable products to the highest bidders, not with cash, but with KiasuPoints! Earn your KiasuPoints by contributing just your opinions to the community and get a chance bid for great products!

## Should we implement the sliding-scale Share Bonus Award?

Yes
7
64%
No
4
36%

### Reverse sliding-scale Share Bonus Award

For the upcoming Auctions, we are thinking of doing a reverse sliding scale for the Share Bonus Award. We will order all the qualifying bidders in reverse order of the amount of KPs in their accounts.
Eg. If A, B, C are the bidders that qualify, and A has 1000KPs, B has 2000KPs, and C has 3000KPs, then
A will get 3000/(1000+2000+3000) = 50% of the spoils
B will get 2000/(1000+2000+3000) = 33% of the spoils
C will get 1000/(1000+2000+3000) = 16% of the spoils

Another way could be the binary approach, ie. the person with the lowest KPs will get 50%, followed by the next who will get 25%, and then 12.5% and so on.

The intent is to allow members with a lower amount of KPs to benefit more from the Share Bonus Award so that they have a better chance to win in subsequent Auctions.

Since KiasuParents.com is a democratic community, we would like to solicit feedback on this new arrangement, or suggestions to further fine-tune this. Please help us by participating in the Poll above.

ChiefKiasu

Posts: 15221
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:16 am
Location: Singapore
Total Likes: 319

Wow election year budget?

Beside doing this, How about give out only 50% of the highest bid to qualified bidders and remove the other 50% from circulation? Too much ks points floating among a small number of members.

tankee

Posts: 17790
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: Singapore
Total Likes: 18

tankee wrote:Wow election year budget?

Beside doing this, How about give out only 50% of the highest bid to qualified bidders and remove the other 50% from circulation? Too much ks points floating among a small number of members.

There are other ways to reduce circulation, eg. impose a maximum cap of 100,000 on KPs . It is a good idea though, to cap the share bonus at a % of the winnings, although we thought it might be less fun for the players.

ChiefKiasu

Posts: 15221
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:16 am
Location: Singapore
Total Likes: 319

too cheem to understand ....
verykiasu2010
KiasuGrandMaster

Posts: 11696
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:06 pm
Total Likes: 2

### Re: Reverse sliding-scale Share Bonus Award

ChiefKiasu wrote:The intent is to allow members with a lower amount of KPs to benefit more from the Share Bonus Award so that they have a better chance to win in subsequent Auctions.

Chief,
Just wondering if you are feeling that any of our past winners are not deserving of the prizes that they won via auctions.... If not, why the need to change the current system?
The recent change in rulings allowing share bonuses of very inflated winning bid has already seen lesser well-off members getting a fairly sizable increase in points and the well-off paris and donald been wipe-clean in one night.

To Quote : We will order all the qualifying bidders in reverse order of the amount of KPs in their accounts.

Are you going to stop me from siphoning out my points to another account to qualify for the biggest slice of the shared winnings?

jedamum
Councillor

Posts: 8515
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:58 pm
Total Likes: 20

### Re: Reverse sliding-scale Share Bonus Award

jedamum wrote:
ChiefKiasu wrote:The intent is to allow members with a lower amount of KPs to benefit more from the Share Bonus Award so that they have a better chance to win in subsequent Auctions.

Chief,
Just wondering if you are feeling that any of our past winners are not deserving of the prizes that they won via auctions.... If not, why the need to change the current system?
The recent change in rulings allowing share bonuses of very inflated winning bid has already seen lesser well-off members getting a fairly sizable increase in points and the well-off paris and donald been wipe-clean in one night.

To Quote : We will order all the qualifying bidders in reverse order of the amount of KPs in their accounts.

Are you going to stop me from siphoning out my points to another account to qualify for the biggest slice of the shared winnings?

Nah... it's just that we are changing from a democratic community to a more communist one, where everyone has the same number of KPs

As I've said, the intent is really to pan-chance the newbies, and even the veterans who emptied their war chest in winning some of the Auctions can benefit from this scheme. It is also not a sustainable source of KPs - kind of like winning the lottery... those with a continuous "income" of KPs by posting interesting articles are really the ones to beat in any Auction.

ChiefKiasu

Posts: 15221
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:16 am
Location: Singapore
Total Likes: 319

### Re: Reverse sliding-scale Share Bonus Award

Chief, just thinking out loud. Please do not be offended.

ChiefKiasu wrote:...the intent is really to pan-chance the newbies...

Won't that discourage them from sharing and contributing to KSP.com? It sounds like a "free-rider" to me.

ChiefKiasu wrote:...veterans who emptied their war chest in winning some of the Auctions...

Well, they had their turn. They won the auction, and had their dream product. Time to give others a chance.

qms
ClassMonitor

Posts: 10976
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 10:35 am
Total Likes: 12

### Re: Reverse sliding-scale Share Bonus Award

qms wrote:Chief, just thinking out loud. Please do not be offended.

ChiefKiasu wrote:...the intent is really to pan-chance the newbies...

Won't that discourage them from sharing and contributing to KSP.com? It sounds like a "free-rider" to me.

ChiefKiasu wrote:...veterans who emptied their war chest in winning some of the Auctions...

Well, they had their turn. They won the auction, and had their dream product. Time to give others a chance.

Yes, these are indeed the considerations against implementing such a scheme. That's why we are seeking opinions from the community before we decide to implement this scheme.

In the same vein as your argument, even having the Share Bonus Award already runs against the general principle that members should earn points through their contributions. Should we discard the scheme as well?

ChiefKiasu

Posts: 15221
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:16 am
Location: Singapore
Total Likes: 319

I think that Chief is right, as the first place people don't get any "extras" for giving up more of their KSPoints to get the award........

Muffins
KiasuGrandMaster

Posts: 2193
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:28 am
Total Likes: 0

Voted.
Good luck to all in the upcoming auction

duriz
KiasuGrandMaster

Posts: 2282
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:16 pm
Total Likes: 0

Next