mindays wrote:stetan wrote:mindays wrote:
Mind you that more than half of VJC's cohort make up of JAE students, not IP! How can you use PSLE COP to determine the academic standards of VJ?! I am not saying that EJC is bad, in fact I acknowledged that IPJCs have their standards to meet. I am sorry that I have to disagree with you, but a more established VJC is more likely to value add the students than an infant EJC.
I am not comparing anything. I am again pointing out the biased and flawed nature of your analysis again.
You said" VS IP leads up to VJC which holds a much better ranking than EJC (from CHS IP)" In my earlier post, I have already shown why your analysis is biased and flawed.
You said you cannot compare JC performance on PSLE cutoff. I agree and that's why I refrain from doing so.
The only way to compare JC performance is through their A level results. But you know that EJC have not produce A level graduates yet....so what facts are you using for your analysis? You personal opinion?
Hey, I have specifically stated that no one knows what is the true standards of EJC until the real deal is up. I made comparisons with RVHS and brought in ACJC as they are parallel in results. I merely casted my doubts on the ability of the pioneer batch of EJC students and that should not be taken as a fact that EJC students are inferior in quality. You shouldn't be over sensitive over a view like this. Furthermore, you were trying to justify that EJC was almost on par with VJC, as shown with the COP given. However, I have pointed out the fact that the majority of VJC cohort makes up of JAE students aka O Level graduates. Once again, this thread should belong to the tertiary section, don't deprive other parents who are more interested in having their queries answered in this secondary section especially when the S1 Posting is active.
You claim that EJC will perform worse than ACJC in your posts base on cut off points. I merely highlight to you that 2/3 of the cohort in EJC are from IP and the cutoff do not apply to them. You know this fact but deliberately chose to compare them in a biased fashion.
I never did say anything about EJC being better than VJC. you were the one that insisted the VS IP program is better than the CHS IP program. I just stated facts to indicate that they were par. I base my posts on facts, you based you posts on partiality